Efektivitas Penggunaan Kahoot Sebagai Alat Evaluasi Pembelajaran IPAS Materi Rantai Makanan di Sekolah Dasar

Authors

  • Siti Lulu Lutfiah Universitas Setia Budhi Rangkasbitung
  • Qori Oktaviani Universitas Setia Budhi Rangkasbitung
  • Shifa Salsabila Universitas Setia Budhi Rangkasbitung
  • Yadi Heryadi Universitas Setia Budhi Rangkasbitung

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.46306/jurinotep.v3i3.123

Keywords:

Food Chain Learning, Influence on Learning Simulations, Learning Media.

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the effectiveness of the use of Kahoot! as an evaluation tool for learning science on food chain materials, especially in improving student understanding of concepts, motivation, and involvement. The research method used is qualitative with data collection through observation, interviews, and document analysis in an elementary school that implements Kahoot! in learning evaluation. The results of the study show that Kahoot! has succeeded in significantly increasing student motivation and participation, but its effectiveness in supporting an in-depth understanding of the concept of the food chain is still limited. Use of Kahoot! tend to encourage quick answers that sometimes ignore conceptual understanding and cause visual overload and digital fatigue in students. These findings underscore the need for a learning approach that combines Kahoot! with reflective strategies and the active role of teachers to maximize their benefits. In conclusion, Kahoot! It is a useful evaluation tool if it is properly integrated with the characteristics of the material and the cognitive needs of students, so as to be able to improve the quality of learning evaluation holistically. This research makes an important contribution to the development of adaptive and meaningful digital assessments in primary education.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Alf Inge Wang. (2015). The wear out effect of a game-based student response system. Computers & Education, 82, 217–227.

Aryal, H. (2021). A literature survey on student feedback assessment tools and their usage in sentiment analysis. A Preprint. Retrieved from http://arxiv.org/abs/2109.07904

Creswell, J. W. (2016). Research Design: Pendekatan Kualitatif, Kuantitatif, dan Mixed. Pustaka Pelajar. Yogyakarta.

Darmiah, D. (2023). Efektifitas Penggunaan Aplikasi Kahoot Sebagai Alat Evaluasi Pada Mata Kuliah Baca Tulis Al-Qur’an. Pionir: Jurnal Pendidikan, 12(3). https://doi.org/10.22373/pjp.v12i3.20872

Eun-Ju Lee, Hye-Yon Lee, Sukyoung Choi. (2020). Is the message the medium? How politicians’ Twitter blunders affect perceived authenticity of Twitter communication,. Computers in Human Behavior, 104.

Farda Iyyan Sari Saleh, Meirza Nanda Faradita, B. M. (2024). Analisis Penerapan Aplikasi Kahoot Sebagai Media Pembelajaran Pada Kurikulum Merdeka Dijenjang Sd Dalam Mata Pelajaran IPAS. Pendas: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Dasar, 09(20), 5595–5609.

Febriansah, A. T., Syaifuddin, A., & Soepriyanto, Y. (2021). Perkembangan Gamifikasi di Bidang Pendidikan. Scholaria Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Kebudayaan, 14(2), 177–186.

Fleming, N. D., & Mills, C. (1992). Not Another Inventory, Rather a Catalyst for Reflection. To Improve the Academy, 11, 137–155.

Hartono, A. (2022). Kahoot Pada Materi Usaha Dan Pesawat Sederhana Dalam Kehidupan Sehari-Hari Desember 2022. SKRIPSI Universitas Islam Negeri Kiai Haji Achmad Siddiq Jember.

John Sweller. (2011). Chapter Two - Cognitive Load Theory. Psychology of Learning and Motivation-Academic Press, 55.

Kyungmee Lee. (2017). Rethinking the accessibility of online higher education: A historical review. The Internet and Higher Education, 33, 15–23.

Legault, L. (2020). Encyclopedia of Personality and Individual Differences. Encyclopedia of Personality and Individual Differences, (October). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28099-8

Lev S Vygotsky. (1978). Mind in society (M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, S. Scribner, & E. Souberman, Eds.). MA: Harvard University Press. Cambridge.

Marsela, A., Kholidin, N., & Niam, A. U. (2024). Pengaruh Media Pembelajaran Kahoot Berbasis Touch and Play terhadap Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Peserta Didik Sekolah Dasar. FingeR: Journal of Elementary School, 3(2), 65–74.

Matthew B. Miles , A. Michael Huberman, J. S. (2014). Analisis Data Kualitatif. SAGE. Retrieved from https://books.google.co.id/books/about/Qualitative_Data_Analysis.html?id=3CNrUbTu6CsC

Nur Masita Rusydiana. (2022). Efektivitas Penggunaan Aplikasi Evaluasi Kahoot Dalam Meningkatkan Prestasi Belajar Kognitif Pada Mata Pelajaran Pendidikan Agama Islam Dan Budi Pekerti Kelas XI MIPA di SMAN 1 Taman Sidoarjo. Skripsi : Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Ampel Surabaya, 33(1), 1–12.

Prasetyo, A. R., Handayaningrum, W., & Rahayu, E. W. (2025). Digital Fatigue and Cognitive Overload : Psychological Challenges in the Era of Cyber Education at Universitas Negeri Malang. Prosiding Seminar Pendidikan Seni Budaya, 2, 1–10.

Rahmawati, S. (2023). Efektivitas Penggunaan Aplikasi Kahoot Dalam Pembelajaran Ipa Sd. Jurnal Elementary, 6(1), 30. https://doi.org/10.31764/elementary.v6i1.12834

Sugiyono. (2019). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif, Kuantitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta. Bandung.

Sweller, J. (1988). Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on learning. Cognitive Science, 12(2), 257–285. https://doi.org/10.1016/0364-0213(88)90023-7

Toda, A. M., Klock, A. C. T., Oliveira, W., Palomino, P. T., Rodrigues, L., Shi, L., … Cristea, A. I. (2019). Analysing gamification elements in educational environments using an existing Gamification taxonomy. Smart Learning Environments, 6(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-019-0106-1

Downloads

Published

2025-01-30

How to Cite

Lutfiah, S. L. ., Oktaviani, Q. ., Salsabila, S. ., & Heryadi, Y. . (2025). Efektivitas Penggunaan Kahoot Sebagai Alat Evaluasi Pembelajaran IPAS Materi Rantai Makanan di Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Inovasi Dan Teknologi Pendidikan, 3(3), 298–314. https://doi.org/10.46306/jurinotep.v3i3.123